Saturday, November 12, 2011

The Most Important Issue In the Upcoming Election


The most important and relevant issue, but one unlikely to be addressed in the upcoming elections is a reform of our political system. The United States is an idea based on the notion of “for the people by the people.” Money and lobbyists have changed the meaning to “for the rich and powerful by the rich and powerful.” The last decade has seen millions of jobs move overseas, enriching corporations. Taxpayers have had to foot the bill for fraudulent investments while those responsible have not had to suffer any repercussions. People are losing their jobs and their homes. Families are being squeezed. The US Government has started wars based on false pretenses, spending hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives but most people have no idea why we are doing this. We make weapons that we have no enemy to use against. What use is an F-22 fighter plane against terrorists? We build weapons for a Cold War that ended two decades ago. There are over 900 US military bases around the world. Why do we have bases in Europe and Japan? These are wealthy countries that can take care of themselves. The answer is lobbyists for the weapon manufacturers. It is not based on need but on patronage.
The following political changes are needed; an overhaul of the electoral system excluding any monetary donations. In lieu of that candidates should be given free television time or dedicated television and online video channels devoted to electoral campaigning. This will allow candidates to reach the electorate. There should be a stipend paid out of taxpayer funds for candidates who reach a certain level of popular acceptability. Whoever is elected needs to have the Supreme Court revisit its decision in Citizens United versus FEC. Corporations are not people, as Justice Stevens argued in his dissent; “the Court's opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government since the founding”
We need to reduce certain government regulations that stifle growth, while at the same time enforcing SEC regulation and strengthening them. Above all the US needs to reduce its Defense budget. That money should be invested in new businesses. Every year billions of dollars of taxpayer money is invested in research, yet only a tiny portion 3-4% is commercialized. The main reason for this low figure is a lack of early stage investment. Large corporations should be encouraged to let their upper middle management run start up companies. This not only benefits their employees, but addresses the issue of forty and fifty year old workers, with a lot of experience finding themselves out of a job and being too overqualified to find another. Other funds should be spent retraining and reeducating workers for the twenty-first century economy.
The United States strength and stability has been based on a vibrant middle class. Currently, the US is 49th in the world in income equality, just above Mexico. Our students are 29th among industrialized nations in the PISA International Student Tests for Science and Math, there are 50 million people out of a population of 300 million living under the poverty line. This has to change, or else America the land of opportunity, the last best hope for mankind will begin a long and painful decent into irrelevance.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

In the Search For God


"They believe that something came out of nothing, that reason came from irrationality, that a complex universe and natural order came out of randomness and chaos, that consciousness came from non-consciousness and that life emerged from non-life. Atheists believe, Seddon writes, that “a multiverse (for which there is no experimental or observational evidence) containing an inconceivably large number of universes spontaneously created itself.”
Yet, Hitchens insists, “our belief is not a belief.” Nonsense. Atheism requires a belief in the unbelievable" ..Buchanan(Christmas in the an Anti-Christian Age.)
 Throughout known human history, mankind has looked out on the world and observed two things; first an apparent order to Nature and second a sense or belief that there was some unseen Life Force behind this creation. Across the centuries, cultures around the world have given different names to this Unseen Presence; in the West we call it God. Belief in God, no matter what religion or spiritual tradition has had a profound impact on societies, effecting how they perceive Reality.
In the last two centuries, an ever increasing number of people have concluded that there is no God; their trust is placed in reason, logic and empirical science to explain the mysteries of nature and human existence. Belief in God is viewed as a mark of ignorance. But is that an oversimplification?  
A physicist’s perception of Reality based on scientific experimentation and laws is that; Matter is mostly made of empty space, what we perceive from our senses as solid substances are in fact the electrical forces between particles of this Matter, what we “see” with our eyes as objects are the electrical impulses translated in the brain as Forms which appear as solid substances. This could be demonstrated by an X-Ray Crystallography image of some crystalline compound like Salt, Sodium Chloride (NaCl). The image would consist of very small dots regularly laid out in mostly empty space. How different is that from the Ancient Greek Pagan belief or the beliefs of the three monotheistic religions in the soul, explained in philosophical terms by reference to Form and Essence?  
The current consensus among Astronomers is that the Universe began in a “Big Bang” billions of years ago, all the energy in the Universe was once crushed into a singularity, and then it exploded. The First Law Of Thermodynamics, states as axiomatic, Energy can never be created or destroyed, it follows that the energy now part of Nature was there in a different form billions of years ago at the Big Bang. How different is that from the Eastern mystical tradition belief in the Oneness of all life, such as is held in Hinduism? Astronomer, Paul Davis stated “Scientists themselves normally take for granted that we live in a rational, ordered cosmos subject to precise laws that can be uncovered by human reasoning. Yet, why this should be so remains a tantalizing mystery.” 1
There are crucial differences of perspectives between non-believers and believers concerning the fundamental questions of human existence; what the meaning, origin and purpose is of life, how Humans should order their lives and society. This search for Order or “The Good” is allegedly discovered by some believers in a non-rational spiritual quest, for others through a tradition of revelations by God to prophets and holy men, still others by using rational and dispassionate analysis, sometimes called Natural Law. For non-believers humankind can accomplish this with reason and science alone, and further as life in theory is based on a long evolutionary process subject to chance, in the grand scheme of evolution, there is no special significance to human life beyond what Humans invest in it. Put another way, the difference between believers and non-believers comes down to what is the meaning of life and where does the authority to impose morality and ethics come from? For most of history it has been expressed in a Need For God.
Pagan Religions
The concepts and role of the Unseen Presence, called God varies according to the circumstances of the believers at different times in History. Early tribal societies were territorial; each tribe had their own names for God, and their own myths. There were two common beliefs; if they imitated the actions of the Gods they would share their power (KA5), and everything on Earth was believed to be replica of something Divine (KA6). Gods represented the projected hopes and fears of the people, would the rains come to insure a good harvest?, would they be protected from enemies?. Ritual beliefs in sacrifice, such as offering first born children, first fruits of the harvest were made to keep these Gods satisfied. 
The first written record we have is from the Sumerians, in Mesopotamia, circa 4000 BCE, there were similar beliefs and practices in many cultures through the centuries; the 16th Century Conquistadors were so shocked by the mass ritual killings of humans by Aztecs, they buried all their religious symbolism. Today in Mexico City, The Wall Of Skulls is a horrifying visual reminder of the price paid to satisfy the Gods of early pagan beliefs.
Over time through a process of emanation and myth the Gods multiplied into a pantheon. The Gods of Wind, War, Sun, Fertility, Love etc were poetic projections of human longings. For later critics, such as Baron of Holbach this construct created an incoherent idea of God “poets and theologians had done nothing over the centuries but make a gigantic, exaggerated man, whom they will render illusory by dint of heaping together incompatible qualities.” (KA344) Regardless, these pagan myths, beliefs and religious festivals were essential civic practices to ensure the continual smooth running of their societies. The Gods told about in myths were very real to ordinary people; Gods were “seen” present in charismatic or gifted individuals. An example of this is found in The Acts of the Apostles, Paul and Barnabas were mistaken for Zeus and Hermes by the people of Lystra in Turkey (KA15). The philosopher Aristotle regarded these myths as revealing a more serious truth than any produced by history “for poetry speaks of what is universal, history what is particular”. For the Greek philosophers God was a transcendent reality, man was a microcosm of the Universe part divine attributes part base flawed matter. The goal of man was to imitate the activity of God, which first and foremost required gaining Wisdom. God was pure thought, and activation, but he did not direct or effect lives. While the insights of philosophers were largely ignored by the ordinary people, subsequently their ideas would have an important impact on Jewish, Christian and Muslim beliefs.
Monotheists
Paganism, Karen Armstrong writes was an essentially tolerant faith. (KA49) That is not a description that could be applied to the religion written down and redacted around 600 BCE called Judaism, and the bases for two other monotheistic religions. The God of Israel, Yahweh, we are told is a jealous God, He is also to the modern reader a tribal, psychotic, genocidal God. His chosen people were warned if did not obey Yahweh “you will be torn from the land”.(KA53). Modern Biblical studies referred to as the Documentary Hypothesis identify 4 different traditions in the Torah or Old Testament. J, E, P, D. J represents the Yahwists, E the Elohists, D the Deuteronomists and P the Priestly writer2. The compilation of the various traditions is believed to have been completed during or just after the Babylonian exile. Importantly, it was compiled by Priests most likely from Judah. The harshness towards goyim, exclusivity, rituals and above all the insistence on Temple worship were in modern parlance their sales pitch to lure Israelites from Babylon and other places back to worship at the Temple being rebuilt in Jerusalem. It was a tough sell; the Israelites had been told the Promised Land was given to them by God. But it was a land they only briefly controlled, overrun by powerful neighbors like the Assyrians and Babylonians. 
The Israelites according archeologist Israel Finkelstein of Tel Aviv University initially were landless Canaanites who adopted a belief in one God3. In a pagan world where Deities were territorial and religious beliefs were civic duties, a group who refused to play by rules would be a source of resentment. The God of Israel was unlike the pagan Gods, He was passionately involved in human affairs. Through revelation to Prophets he issued Laws, and warnings insisted on compassion and caring for the less fortunate. But unlike the holistic view of pagans, there was a divide between Yahweh and Mankind. This divide was caused by disobedience in the Garden Of Eden, it was humankind’s fault that there was evil, suffering and other ills, Human nature though made in the image and likeness of God was flawed. The redactors of the Bible were offering the people of Israel a chance to reconnect with God by returning if they obeyed the laws, and the Priestly caste were the keepers of the law.
It was in this milieu of a legalistic rigid framework under yet another foreign occupation that Jesus of Nazareth began preaching. “My yoke is easy and my burden light” 4 a consistent theme of his preaching was that the Pharisees, the legal interpreters of the Law had hijacked it for their personal power and benefit. He called them hypocrites, in parables like the Good Samaritan it was the ritually impure Samaritan who helped the injured man, not the priest, he objected to their greed, by driving the moneylenders out of the Temple. Armstrong says these condemnations found in Matthew were inauthentic; regrettably this maybe an example of her bowing to political correctness, there are passages in all the Gospels that show Jesus’ preferences for the outcast and a criticism of authority. These and numerous other examples point to his main objection, the Israelites were to be “a light to the nations”, showing the world how to live a good life. Instead it had been turned into a tribal, exclusive, legalistic belief cut-off from the rest of mankind and other Jews. As Armstrong later points out “Philo seemed embarrassed by the historical books of the Bible”(KA69). It was these Greek speaking Diaspora Jews that Paul and his disciples sought. Jews like Philo who were not considered practicing Jews because they did not make the pilgrimage to the Temple in Jerusalem. 
Early Christianity was seen by its followers as the Judaism that was intended had not the Priestly caste hijacked the original spirit of the Law. In the centuries ahead as Christianity grew, it would fall back into to same errors made by Priests of the Old Testament. Unlike Judaism, Christianity aimed at a universal audience. To create a broader based theology they turned to the Ancient Greek philosophers, first Plato and his followers and later in 13th Century to Aristotle. When plagues hit cities the Christians stayed to care for the sick, they took in widows and cared for orphans, they practiced what the prophets like Amos, and Isaiah had preached “ Learn to do good, search for justice, help the oppressed, be just to the orphan and plead for the widow” (KA44). The theology of Christianity, the concept that Jesus’ sacrificial death had rejoined humankind to God, closed the divide between Man and God but led to problematic philosophical issues. The most contentious was the doctrine of the Trinity formulated at the Council of Nicaea in the fourth century. Armstrong’s account leading up to this is muddled; she says Paul had a dim view of Greek rationalism calling it foolishness (KA86). The quote from his letter is “the Jews look for signs, the Greeks looks wisdom we look for foolishness”. Further she states “Paul never called Jesus God” (KA83) but then quotes from Paul letter to the Philippians “who subsisting in the form of God did not cling to his equality with God” (KA88). Armstrong is a former nun and an apostate, in most of her writings a reflection of the bitterness felt by the loss of her faith is very evident.  
The doctrine of the Trinity comes out of the beginning of John’s gospel “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” The formulation of the Trinity, as Augustine and other accepted came out of the Platonic concept of emanations. “God had a single essence which remained incomprehensible to us, but three expressions” (KA115). The Trinity is a mystical or spiritual experience. This doctrine scandalized the Jews, confused many and was in part responsible for the creation of the third monotheistic religion Islam.
 The Arabs as traders could not fail to notice there were new concepts of God coming from India via Iran, from Jews living in the Orient and from the Christian Byzantine empires. In 600 CE they were still practicing the pagan beliefs long abandoned by other cultures; they had no tradition of prophets like the Jews and Christians or religious teachers like Buddha. In 610 that changed when a Bedouin merchant from Mecca, Muhammad had a visit from the Angel Gabriel. Thus began first in an oral tradition of spoken Arabic and then written down by Syriac Christians centuries later what became known as the Koran, the literal word of God, the word of Al-lah. The Koran returns to a Semitic idea of Unity, but with the Universal outlook of Christianity. Al-Lah like Yahweh is the uncaused cause of all being, divided from human kind from which he demands submission, like the Torah, the Koran set out laws of behavior and ritual that must be followed. But the Koran, does pay homage to its antecedents, the prophets of the Old Testament, Jesus, Mary his mother, above all it ties all three faiths to Abraham. The promise made to Abraham that his descendents would be more numerous than the sands of the shore had come to pass. 
 For all the violence and repression experienced through these different monotheistic faiths, they have in their different ways been the bases for progress throughout the world. The emphasis on compassion, caring for sick and the less fortunate has been a constant if not always followed belief. They have given hope in times of despair, they have inspired great music, writing and art.
Mystics
All major religious faiths have come at one point or another to the conclusion that God is beyond our capacity for reason. This insight does not eliminate God, instead it suggests a different path, one Armstrong spends the greater part of her book examining and endorsing. That path is mysticism, experiencing the Unseen Presence in an emotional, intuitive manner. Maybe she is right. The modern world with its conflicting religions all claiming the truth cannot accommodate all these different doctrinal disputes. The histories of the three great monotheistic religions are one of great progress, but also one of war, torture, oppression and violence. God plays such an important role in the lives of billions of people; any attempt to enforce doctrinal orthodoxy will be met by violent resistance. In the West the spiritual bankruptcy of materialism, the role of religion in wars, the progress of science to undermine the myths of the Bible has left people looking for an alternative. Many have turned to the Eastern religions of Hinduism and Buddhism.
Hinduism is a belief developed over the millenniums to cope with the wonders and terrors of existence. By the eighth century BCE the pagan gods of the early Vedas had been replaced by the religious teacher. They taught that there was an underlying unity to the world, all subsumed by a force they called Brahman. Brahman does not speak to mankind; instead it is an ultimate self inside everyone (KA30). The main problem identified by Hinduism is that we do not know who our true selves really are; we are caricatures in finite personalities. This results in the human experience being fragmented, isolated and alienated. The obstacle to reaching a higher realization of ultimate knowledge is called Maya. One can reach this true reality of pure consciousness by contemplation, self discipline and meditation. This in turn will lead to good actions creating good karma in a cyclic process of reincarnation until the individual is joined to Brahman and is no longer reborn. These religious beliefs were refined by Siddhartha Gautama, known as Buddha. His concern was with suffering and pain, dukkha, this could be relieved by compassion for all living being, speaking and behaving gently and refraining from anything that clouds the mind. (KA32).
 In a world of constant change good things do not last creating anxiety, insecurity and uncertainty, adopting the meditation practices and attitudes allows one to reach Nirvana, a state of unchanging peace. There is no God who issues orders, what happens is part of the fabric of existence determined by previous lives. Both religions are open to the charge of fatalism, but the techniques for personal change and contentment are also techniques adopted by the monotheistic religions. These mystical approaches are experienced in the Jewish tradition by Kabbalah, in Islam by sects like the Sufis and in the Eastern Orthodox and Western tradition by monasticism. What they have in common is the belief that discovering God or the Ultimate reality is an emotional experience involving the imagination, that the answer to the questions of God may not be within our reach.
Summary
There is crisis in modernity; scientific advances have obliterated the myths that have sustained mankind from falling into despair or nihilism. The God of the monotheistic traditions and the Unseen Reality of the East have in their different ways allowed mankind to create civilizations, communities, to survive. Frederick Nietzsche the great German philosopher predicted the terrible task mankind faced by “the Death of God”. His proposal for a race of Supermen inspired Nazi doctrine, writers like Ayn Rand in whose books libertarian selfishness is praised, as well as science has added its stamp of approval thorough Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. We live in a time when the values of compassion, selflessness and kindness are under the threat of militaristic, materialistic secular barbarianism with the capacity for industrial scale killing. If ever there was a need for God, the need is now.

Bibliography
1 Davies, Paul. “The Mind of God”. Simon and Schuster 1993 p.21
2 Friedman, Richard. “Who Wrote The Bible” Harper 1987 
3 Finkelstein, Israel. Silberman, Neil Asher. The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts. Free Press 2002 
4 Matt 11:30

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

At The Close Of The Day

On April 1st, my mother celebrated her 93rd birthday. She was born in 1918 during World War 1, lived through the Great Depression, and was a nurse in London during World War 2. In the 1950’s she became an avid fan of Elvis Presley, then in the 1960’s The Beatles and The Rolling Stones. Above all she loved watching boxing; her favorite boxer was Floyd Patterson. She lived through the sexual revolution, she watched Man land on the Moon, has traveled through Europe, and the US. Every day she reads her Horoscope; she believes in spirits. White flowers are banned in her house because a gift of white flowers was given a few hours before a telephone call that informed her that her father had died. She was convinced he would have lived if she had not brought those flowers into the house. For as long as I can remember, she loved gambling small sums on horses. On a visit to Santa Anita racetrack in California, she won $150 on a 5 dollar bet. Her secret to success was finding names of horses that relate something in her life; she would bet on a horse called March Surprise because March was when my sister was born. Money never really meant much to her, she seemed to get the greatest joy in giving it away. Every charity that had a photo of some unfortunate, she subscribed to, telling me “You were born with nothing, you will leave this earth with nothing”.

My mother was the second youngest of six children born on a farm in Ireland. All her siblings are now dead, as are all her friends. In of itself that is something of a miracle. She was hospitalized in 1930s for pneumonia and nearly died, and again at 80 when she was thrown across a bus that stopped unexpectedly. She broke her hip losing half the blood in her body. The doctors were mystified by how she managed to survive. When she returned for a check up, they were surprised as her vital signs were strong, even though she has smoked cigarettes since age 18. My mother is something of a medical marvel at the local hospital.

My Dad and Mom were married in 1949, they stayed together 52 years. Dad died at home, sitting on the couch while my Mom was making him a cup of tea on September 10, 2001. It is a date I cannot forget, as the following day was the infamous 911. With Dad’s death, it seemed the world changed and an era ended.

Now ten years later, another era is ending. When I visited my Mother in January, she was moving from our home into an apartment. The stairs in our home were becoming too much for her. She also was entering the early phases of Dementia. I spent a week with her, and in that time she ghosted in and out of reality. She heard voices of people apparently next door talking about her, then would tell me that “she needed to go to the market to get something for your Dad’s dinner, he will be home soon”. Gently I told her “Mom, he died ten years ago”, she looked at me and said “Then why didn’t anyone tell me”. I had to remind her we both buried him in Ireland, then she asked about her brother, “he’s dead too”, and Molly “she died too”, “she didn’t oh my God they are all dying”” she would say. Mom, I said slowly “Molly, John and Michael all died in 1996”, and she would look at me puzzled “Then who is running the farm at home” she asked. I had to tell her that a neighbor had convinced one of her brothers to take sole title and sign it over to him. We had lost it. “My father would be furious, if he knew that, there would be hell to pay”. “So there is no-one left, I’m the last one” she would say. “Yes Mom you outlived all of them.” This scenario would be repeated over and over with minor variations and voices speaking to her through the walls.

During the day, the daughters and grand daughters of her long dead friends visit. They all love her, love her because she is a character, but also because she is the last link to a now long dead close relative. There is admiration in old age; she has lived in the same neighborhood for over 40 years, and everyone knows her by sight. In their eyes she is living proof that old age doesn’t have to be dreaded, but recently, they too have seen the cracks in her sanity appear. One neighbor found her looking confused and lost, another was told she had just returned from an imaginary holiday in Spain. They now keep an eye on her making sure she gets home safely.

Watching a parent slowly lose their grip on reality is an emotionally devastating experience. They have been the pillar you could always lean on, and now that pillar was crumbling. But it doesn’t have to be all doom and gloom. On the second day of my visit, I decided to call a cab and go for ride around town. First, we got her hair done, then we went to a restaurant to eat. She often forgets to eat, and seeing her clean a plate of vegetables, roast beef, and potatoes not only seemed to make her more alert, but I could see she was enjoying the moment. There we were talking about life, the newspaper gossip, and laughing. She was present in reality enjoying the moment with her son. Whether she would remember it a few hours later did not matter. I was grasping, holding on to the Mother I knew and loved, to moments that we had shared a thousand times before, but now were soon to end. We read our Horoscopes, bought the Racing Form and had a flutter on the horses. We walked around town looking in shop windows, and bought some food at market. I called a cab when she got tired and we went back to her place. Not long after, she lay down and fell asleep. It was then that a great sadness welled up, mixed with gratitude. I had been given an encore performance of the one woman play that was my Mother. I didn’t know how many encore performances I would be allowed. We spent the next five days doing the simple things we had always done: buying bread at the bakery, reading the newspaper, betting on horses, living in the moment, knowing that each was a gift and that anytime soon these simple pleasures would pass.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

What it means to be a father

Life consists of roles, there is man as the worker, what one does for a living, there is the free time hobbyist; gardening, surfing, swimming, cooking, working in the garage whatever gives personal satisfaction, there is the lover and then there is fatherhood. Unlike the other roles this is one that is adopted without any clear picture of how to perform it. Fatherhood is about guidance, it is about training the young, preparing then for the world, it is also about being a role model, but it cannot be organized, it develops and changes as the children age.
In the early years, Dad is more a play friend, he builds Legos, throws balls, answers questions, he is there, but unlike a Mother, his role to a young child is a bit obscure. As the child grows he learns that Dad does things he makes money, takes care of things, and slowly boys realize they want to be like the big guy. In my oldest son I see reflections of myself, he is outgoing, willing to take risks, can be aloof, has a short fuse with little things that annoy, he has charm, girls like him, he also has size 11 and half shoes which can be a joy or a terror depending on who the love of his life is. I have realized for years that my respect, my caring for him is the most important thing in his life. When problems with the world arise, it is to Dad he goes for advice. This reflection on fatherhood created a dilemma for a friend and her 3 boys. One was mine the other two were someone elses. He was their father and that special father son, me and mini me relationship created a problem. One of the things I have noted over the years and one of the reasons my son respects me is that his friends thinks his Dad is cool, he knows about things, eclectic music groups like Joy Division, the forerunner of Nivana and many other alternative rock groups, he not only knows them he has their original 7 inch singles, he reads comic books, likes action movies, plays soccer and he used to surf. This Dad travels a lot, he dresses casually, he comes from a different country, he is a little odd, and he finds it easy to talk and have conversations with them, he is easy going, knows what going on but doesn't let on. In other words he is the Dad they wished they had. With my girls a similar liking happens in their friends, it is tied around my accent, and how unlike I am other Dads, a sort of silliness and aloofness that appeals to their friends, but makes them like me, and tell my girls he is neat, cool whatever. I know because my girls tell me.
With my friend's boys I saw myself slipping into this situation, one lined with problems. One of the main roles of Dad is to explain to their son's the world, why were swords so big in the old days, why they worn chain mail, why this war started. This Dad also has the benefit of knowing what happens in the world in a very real way, why did the financial markets collapse, why did Congress give all that money to those bankers, why do we want to go to war with Iran. Some of these will produce real conflict with the views and attitudes their real Dad. I have a respect for Alternative Medicine, but as a trained scientist I also have immense respect for Modern Medicine, I believe in vaccination, medicines to help cure diseases, alternative medicine for me is a frame of mind, a reference to where drugs came from, before they were tested for 7-10 years. Nature is wonderful but flawed. Bedouins ate camel dung for stomach upsets, it works, but Pepto Bismol works well too and has a better after taste. The crisis for me was if I continued down this path with my friend's boys, their real father would lose his sons. I love their mother very much and always will, I have told that to them many times, and they want to be loved too. So the choice was to keep going and become their Dad or step back be a bore, be a guy no-one special who comes to see their Mom. If I were to lose my son to another man, it would be very hurtful, it would create deep resentment, friction. A son represents a man's dreams to try live their life in a more fulfilling or richer way, to not make the same mistakes, I couldn't deny that to the father of my friend's boys, even though I knew what she wanted was for me to be their father. I'm sorry it was not meant to hurt but a matter of respect and boundaries..

Tuesday, February 08, 2011

Critique of the Compulsive Need To Regulate

In the summer of 2008, the financial markets collapsed. Shortly after we learned that the former President of Nasdaq Bernie Madoff had been running a ponzi scheme, bilking millions out of investors, this was followed by news of poisonous substances being introduced in Chinese baby formula. What is common to all these cases is a lack of oversight and regulation. Max Border in his video was critical that his bbq sauce was not allowed to be sold. He never told us what he puts in it, but lets say he grates a cashew nut, or he adds some MSG, then sells it because the regulations have all been removed. Later that night barely able to breath children are in the emergency ward. Max forgot that some people are allergic to nuts, to MSG, but there were no regulations requiring him to label what the ingredients were and Max had his money, the children parents had the grief and worry. The reason for regulations is to remind parties that their interests, in Max's case to make money involve consideration of other people interests, in this case allergies. As companies become bigger and more powerful the need for regulation should grow commensurate with it. Had the regulations not been stripped away by the Clinton administration under lobbying from Wall Street, had the SEC enforced their own regulations instead of turning a blind eye to the President of Nasdaq neither would have occured. Both are failures to regulate power.
The framers of the Constitution understood this, the Bill of Rights was designed as a way to regulate the power of the Federal government, the wording tells the Government what it cannot do. So why should not the citizens of the US be protected from the awesome power of corporate greed and vested interests. Why should their not be regulation?

Max views the burden of regulation as a form of tax, his argument reminds me of my son asking why he had to do homework at school. Just like homework, regulations are a form of discipline, you do homework, like you observe regulations, because they are part of good work practise. A good company is not one that just makes money, after all drug dealers make money, so do sex traffickers, so do people winning the lottery. A good company is one that improves the community and society in general. When a company moves to a location it gains certain benefits, there are roads, places to park, their employees have schools they can send their children to for free, there are parks to relax in and much more, all made available to the company. They are in a sense a guest, and as a guest they have to respect the wishes of their hosts. I lived in Cross River, New York, there was a regulation that business signs could be no more than 12 inches high and of a certain type. The town council in discussion with the community agreed on the low stated appeal of the signs, it went with the general feel of the town. I approved too, I also approved of the regulation on not building near the watershed, the Croton Falls Reservoir fed New York City, because of those regulations New York does not have to treat its water.
When I examine the arguments put forward by Max, they come down to the only thing that matters is making money. We all saw in 2008 where that argument leads.